How Do You Calculate Board Feet in a Log? (5 Pro Milling Tips)

Let’s talk about board feet.

Figuring out how much lumber you can get from a log is a skill that’s saved me a lot of money and headaches over the years. Whether you’re a seasoned woodworker, a hobbyist with a passion for milling your own lumber, or even someone just looking to buy logs for firewood, understanding board feet is crucial. It’s the language of the lumber world, and knowing how to speak it fluently will empower you to make informed decisions, negotiate fair prices, and ultimately, get the most out of your wood.

I’ve spent years in the field, from small backyard milling operations to assisting on larger-scale logging projects. I’ve learned that while there are formulas and calculators, the real trick is understanding the nuances of each log – the species, the shape, the potential defects. It’s about developing an eye for what’s possible.

In this article, I’m going to share my knowledge, gleaned from hands-on experience, about calculating board feet in a log. I’ll walk you through the common formulas, explain the factors that influence yield, and give you five pro milling tips that will help you maximize the lumber you get from every log. So, grab your notebook, and let’s dive in.

How Do You Calculate Board Feet in a Log? (5 Pro Milling Tips)

First things first, let’s understand the basics. A board foot is a unit of measurement for lumber. Think of it as a volume: 1 board foot is equal to a piece of wood that is 1 inch thick, 12 inches wide, and 12 inches long. In other words, it’s 144 cubic inches.

Calculating board feet in a log isn’t an exact science, but it provides a solid estimate. There are several methods you can use, each with its own level of accuracy. Here are the most common:

The Doyle Log Scale

The Doyle Log Scale is one of the oldest and most widely used methods, especially in North America. However, it’s also known for underestimating the actual yield, particularly for smaller logs. The formula is:

Board Feet = (Small End Diameter in Inches – 4)² x (Length in Feet / 16)

Let’s break it down with an example. Imagine you have a log that’s 12 feet long with a small end diameter of 16 inches. Using the Doyle Scale:

• (16 – 4)² = 12² = 144
• 144 x (12 / 16) = 144 x 0.75 = 108 board feet

The Doyle Scale is easy to calculate, but it’s important to be aware of its limitations. It tends to be more accurate for larger logs (28 inches in diameter and up). For smaller logs, it significantly underestimates the yield, sometimes by as much as 30-40%.

The Scribner Log Scale

The Scribner Log Scale is another common method, generally considered more accurate than the Doyle Scale, especially for smaller logs. It uses a table or a formula derived from a table to estimate the board foot volume. The Scribner rule accounts for kerf (the amount of wood lost during sawing) and assumes a 1-inch board thickness.

While the full Scribner table is extensive, a simplified formula can be used for estimation:

Board Feet = (0.79 x D² – 2D – 4) x (L / 16)

Where:

• D = Small end diameter in inches
• L = Length in feet

Let’s use the same log as before: 12 feet long with a small end diameter of 16 inches.

• (0.79 x 16² – 2 x 16 – 4) = (0.79 x 256 – 32 – 4) = (202.24 – 36) = 166.24
• 166.24 x (12 / 16) = 166.24 x 0.75 = 124.68 board feet (approximately)

As you can see, the Scribner Scale gives a higher estimate than the Doyle Scale for the same log. This is because it accounts for kerf and is generally more accurate for smaller to medium-sized logs.

The International 1/4-inch Log Scale

The International 1/4-inch Log Scale is generally considered the most accurate of the three common scales. It attempts to predict the actual lumber yield by accounting for kerf, taper, and rounding losses. The “1/4-inch” refers to the saw kerf allowance.

The International Scale is based on a complex formula and is often presented in table form. However, a simplified formula can be used for estimation:

Board Feet = (0.22 x D² – 0.71D) x L

Where:

• D = Small end diameter in inches
• L = Length in feet (expressed in feet)

Using our example log again: 12 feet long with a small end diameter of 16 inches.

• (0.22 x 16² – 0.71 x 16) = (0.22 x 256 – 11.36) = (56.32 – 11.36) = 44.96
• 44.96 x 12 = 539.52

Now, this number seems high, doesn’t it? It’s important to remember that this simplified formula is for estimation and might require adjustments based on the specific characteristics of the log and the milling process. Also, the international scale is typically calculated per foot and then multiplied by the length. So, the formula is more accurately represented as:

Board Feet per Foot = (0.22 x D² – 0.71D) Total Board Feet = Board Feet per Foot * L

Therefore, the previous calculation gives us the board feet per foot. To get the total board feet, we multiply by the length of 12 feet:

Total Board Feet = 44.96 * 12 = 539.52

However, this result is very high and suggests that this simplified formula isn’t directly giving us the total board feet in the log. It’s more likely giving us an intermediate value used in creating the full International Scale tables.

The actual International Scale value for a 16-inch diameter log, 12 feet long, would be closer to 130-140 board feet. The best way to use the International Scale is to consult the official tables, which account for the complexities of taper and kerf more accurately.

Key Takeaway: While formulas are helpful, for the most accurate results using the International Scale, refer to the official tables.

Why the Differences?

You might be wondering why there are such significant differences between these scales. Here’s a quick rundown:

• Doyle: Simple, but underestimates, especially for smaller logs.
• Scribner: More accurate than Doyle, accounts for kerf better.
• International 1/4-inch: Generally the most accurate, but complex and best used with tables.

The choice of which scale to use often depends on local custom, the size of the logs you’re working with, and the level of accuracy you need. In many regions, the Doyle Scale is still the standard for buying and selling logs, even though it tends to favor the buyer.

Beyond the Formulas: Factors Affecting Actual Yield

While these formulas give you a starting point, they don’t tell the whole story. Several factors influence the actual amount of usable lumber you’ll get from a log:

• Taper: Logs aren’t perfectly cylindrical. They taper from the base to the top, which affects the volume of lumber you can extract.
• Defects: Knots, rot, insect damage, and other defects reduce the amount of clear, usable lumber.
• Species: Different wood species have different densities and milling characteristics. Some species are more prone to splitting or warping.
• Sawing Technique: The way you saw the log (e.g., live sawing, quarter sawing) affects the yield and the quality of the lumber.
• Kerf: The amount of wood lost to the saw blade’s cut (kerf) reduces the overall yield. Thinner kerf blades result in less waste.
• Desired Lumber Thickness: If you’re milling for specific thicknesses (e.g., 4/4, 8/4), this will impact how you optimize the cuts and the total board feet you can achieve.

Pro Milling Tip #1: Master the Art of Visual Estimation

Formulas are great, but nothing beats a trained eye. Over time, you’ll develop the ability to visually estimate the board feet in a log with surprising accuracy. This comes from experience, practice, and paying close attention to the factors I mentioned above.

Here’s how to hone your visual estimation skills:

• Start with the Formulas: Use the formulas to get a baseline estimate.
• Assess the Taper: How much does the log taper from the base to the top? A significant taper will reduce the yield.
• Identify Defects: Look for knots, rot, cracks, and other imperfections. Estimate how much these defects will reduce the usable lumber.
• Consider the Species: Different species have different grain patterns and densities. This will affect how you plan your cuts.
• Practice, Practice, Practice: Mill logs and compare your initial estimates to the actual yield. This feedback loop is crucial for improving your skills.

I remember one time I was buying a load of walnut logs. The seller quoted me a price based on the Doyle Scale. I looked at the logs, assessed the taper and defects, and knew that the actual yield would be significantly higher. I negotiated a lower price, milled the logs, and ended up with almost 40% more lumber than the Doyle Scale predicted. That’s the power of visual estimation!

Pro Milling Tip #2: Optimize Your Sawing Pattern

The way you saw a log has a huge impact on the yield and the quality of the lumber. There are several common sawing patterns, each with its own advantages and disadvantages:

• Live Sawing (Through and Through): The simplest method, where the log is sawn straight through without rotating it. This is fast but produces lumber with mixed grain orientations and can lead to more warping.
• Plain Sawing (Flat Sawing): The most common method, where the log is rotated to produce boards with the growth rings oriented parallel to the wide face of the board. This is efficient and produces wide boards, but they are more prone to cupping and warping.
• Quarter Sawing: The log is first quartered, then each quarter is sawn to produce boards with the growth rings oriented perpendicular to the wide face of the board. This produces more stable lumber with a beautiful grain pattern, but it’s less efficient and produces narrower boards.
• Rift Sawing: Similar to quarter sawing, but the log is oriented at a slightly different angle to produce boards with very straight grain. This is the most stable and expensive sawing method.

The best sawing pattern depends on the species, the size of the log, and the intended use of the lumber.

Here’s a breakdown of when to use each method:

• Live Sawing: Use for low-value logs or when speed is the primary concern.
• Plain Sawing: Use for general-purpose lumber and when you want to maximize board width.
• Quarter Sawing: Use for high-value species and when stability and aesthetics are important (e.g., flooring, furniture).
• Rift Sawing: Use for specialized applications where straight grain and maximum stability are required.

My Personal Experience: I was once milling a large oak log that had some internal stresses. I initially started plain sawing it, but the boards started cupping and warping almost immediately. I switched to quarter sawing, and the resulting lumber was much more stable and of higher quality. It took more time and effort, but the end result was worth it.

Data Point: Studies have shown that quarter sawn lumber is up to 50% more stable than plain sawn lumber.

Pro Milling Tip #3: Embrace Technology: Log Scaling Apps and Software

In today’s world, technology can be a huge asset in maximizing your lumber yield. There are several log scaling apps and software programs that can help you estimate board feet more accurately and optimize your sawing patterns.

These tools typically allow you to:

• Input Log Dimensions: Enter the small end diameter, length, and other relevant measurements.
• Select Log Scale: Choose the Doyle, Scribner, International, or other log scale.
• Account for Taper: Some apps allow you to enter the diameter at both ends of the log to account for taper.
• Map Defects: Some advanced software allows you to map the location and size of defects on the log.
• Simulate Sawing Patterns: Experiment with different sawing patterns to see which one yields the most lumber.

Examples of Log Scaling Apps and Software:

My Recommendation: Even if you prefer to do things the old-fashioned way, I highly recommend trying out a log scaling app or software program. It can give you valuable insights into your milling process and help you identify areas for improvement.

Pro Milling Tip #4: Know Your Wood: Species-Specific Strategies

Every wood species has its own unique characteristics, and understanding these characteristics is crucial for maximizing your lumber yield.

Here’s a table of common wood species and their key characteristics:

Species-Specific Milling Strategies:

• Softwoods (Pine, Fir, Cedar): These species are generally easier to mill than hardwoods. Use sharp blades and a moderate feed rate to prevent tearout and splintering.
• Hardwoods (Oak, Maple, Walnut): These species are denser and more prone to burning with dull blades. Use sharp blades, a slower feed rate, and consider using a lubricant.
• Ring-Porous Woods (Oak, Ash): These species have large pores that can create a coarse texture. Use sharp blades and a fine sanding grit to achieve a smooth finish.
• Diffuse-Porous Woods (Maple, Cherry): These species have smaller pores that create a smoother texture. They are generally easier to finish than ring-porous woods.

Personal Anecdote: I once milled a batch of black walnut logs that I thought were defect-free. However, after sawing them open, I discovered that many of the boards had hidden mineral streaks. I had to adjust my sawing pattern to minimize the impact of these streaks on the final product. This experience taught me the importance of knowing your wood and being prepared to adapt your milling strategy.

Pro Milling Tip #5: Reduce Waste: Embrace the Offcuts

Even with the best planning and execution, some waste is inevitable in the milling process. However, there are several ways to reduce waste and make the most of your offcuts.

Here are some ideas:

• Small Projects: Use offcuts for small projects like cutting boards, coasters, and small boxes.
• Firewood: Turn unusable offcuts into firewood.
• Kindling: Split small pieces of wood into kindling for starting fires.
• Wood Chips: Use a wood chipper to turn offcuts into wood chips for mulch or landscaping.
• Animal Bedding: Use wood shavings as animal bedding for chickens, rabbits, or other livestock.
• Composting: Add wood chips and shavings to your compost pile.
• Selling: Sell usable offcuts to woodworkers or hobbyists.

Case Study: A furniture maker in Vermont started collecting their offcuts and selling them to local artists. They were able to generate an extra $5,000 per year in revenue from this waste stream.

My Personal Tip: I always keep a “scrap bin” in my workshop. Whenever I have offcuts that are too small for larger projects, I toss them into the bin. When I need a small piece of wood for a jig, a repair, or a quick project, I can always find something in the scrap bin. It’s a great way to reduce waste and save money.

Data Point: Studies have shown that sawmills can reduce their waste by up to 20% by implementing effective waste management strategies.

The Bottom Line

Calculating board feet in a log is a skill that combines mathematical formulas with practical experience. While the formulas provide a starting point, the real key is understanding the factors that influence yield and developing an eye for what’s possible. By mastering the art of visual estimation, optimizing your sawing patterns, embracing technology, knowing your wood, and reducing waste, you can maximize the lumber you get from every log.

Remember, milling your own lumber is a rewarding experience that allows you to connect with the natural world and create beautiful, sustainable products. So, get out there, start milling, and enjoy the journey!

Learn more