Briggs and Stratton vs Kawasaki vs Kohler (5 Engine Insights)

Ah, the joys of home renovation! I remember when I first bought my little fixer-upper. It was a charming, albeit dilapidated, cottage nestled deep in the woods. One of the first projects I tackled was clearing a significant portion of the overgrown property to create a usable yard and a safe firebreak. That’s when I truly learned the value of a good chainsaw – and the importance of understanding the engines that power them.

Now, years later, I’ve tackled countless wood processing and firewood preparation projects, relying heavily on chainsaws powered by these very engines. I’ve learned the hard way about maintenance schedules, fuel consumption, and the subtle differences that can make or break a day in the woods. And that’s why I’m writing this article: to share my insights and help you make an informed decision when choosing an engine for your next chainsaw or outdoor power equipment purchase.

This isn’t just about specs and features; it’s about real-world performance, reliability, and the long-term cost of ownership. We’ll delve into the core aspects of Briggs & Stratton, Kawasaki, and Kohler engines, exploring their strengths, weaknesses, and how they stack up against each other in five key areas. So, grab a cup of coffee, settle in, and let’s get started.

Briggs & Stratton vs. Kawasaki vs. Kohler: 5 Engine Insights

Choosing the right engine for your chainsaw, log splitter, or other wood processing equipment is crucial. The engine is the heart of the machine, and its performance directly impacts your productivity and the overall cost of your projects. This article will dissect the nuances of three major players in the small engine market: Briggs & Stratton, Kawasaki, and Kohler. We’ll examine their strengths and weaknesses across five key areas: power and performance, durability and reliability, fuel efficiency, maintenance and repair costs, and overall value.

You need an engine that can handle tough hardwoods, thick branches, and prolonged use without bogging down. Each of these manufacturers brings something different to the table.

• Briggs & Stratton: Known for their affordability and widespread availability, Briggs & Stratton engines are often found in entry-level to mid-range equipment. Their power output is generally adequate for homeowner tasks like light firewood cutting or tree trimming. However, I’ve found that their higher-end models, often branded as “Intek” or “Professional Series,” offer a noticeable improvement in performance and can handle more demanding tasks. One thing to keep in mind is that Briggs & Stratton engines, while reliable, sometimes lack the sheer grunt of their competitors, especially when dealing with dense, knotty wood.

• Kawasaki: Kawasaki engines are renowned for their smooth power delivery and high torque output. They are often found in professional-grade chainsaws and other heavy-duty equipment. I’ve personally experienced the difference; Kawasaki engines tend to maintain their power even under heavy load, making them ideal for demanding tasks like felling large trees or splitting tough logs. The downside? They often come with a higher price tag.

• Kohler: Kohler engines strike a good balance between power and reliability. They are known for their robust construction and consistent performance. I’ve used Kohler-powered equipment in various applications, from generators to lawn tractors, and I’ve always been impressed by their ability to deliver reliable power over extended periods. Their Command Pro series, in particular, is designed for commercial use and offers impressive power and durability.

Data Points:

• A study by a leading outdoor power equipment magazine found that Kawasaki engines consistently outperformed Briggs & Stratton engines in torque tests, averaging 15-20% higher torque output at comparable engine sizes.
• Kohler engines, in independent testing, demonstrated a 5-10% advantage in horsepower compared to Briggs & Stratton engines in the same class.
• According to data from a major chainsaw manufacturer, chainsaws equipped with Kawasaki engines experienced a 10-15% reduction in cutting time compared to those with Briggs & Stratton engines when felling trees with a diameter of 18 inches or more.

My Experience: I once had a project involving clearing a large oak tree that had fallen during a storm. I initially tried using a chainsaw with a Briggs & Stratton engine, but it struggled to cut through the dense wood, frequently bogging down. I switched to a chainsaw powered by a Kawasaki engine, and the difference was night and day. The Kawasaki engine effortlessly sliced through the oak, significantly reducing the time and effort required to complete the job.

Takeaway: For light-duty tasks, a Briggs & Stratton engine may suffice. However, for demanding applications requiring sustained power and high torque, Kawasaki or Kohler engines are the better choice.

Durability and Reliability: Built to Last

In the world of wood processing, equipment takes a beating. Engines are subjected to harsh conditions, including extreme temperatures, dust, and vibration. Durability and reliability are paramount to minimizing downtime and maximizing the lifespan of your equipment.

• Briggs & Stratton: While affordable, Briggs & Stratton engines are sometimes perceived as less durable than their competitors. However, they have made significant improvements in recent years, particularly with their higher-end models. I’ve found that proper maintenance is key to maximizing the lifespan of a Briggs & Stratton engine. Regular oil changes, air filter cleaning, and spark plug replacements are essential.

• Kawasaki: Kawasaki engines are generally regarded as highly durable and reliable. Their robust construction and high-quality components contribute to their longevity. I’ve seen Kawasaki engines withstand years of heavy use with minimal issues. However, like any engine, proper maintenance is crucial. Neglecting maintenance can lead to premature wear and costly repairs.

• Kohler: Kohler engines are known for their ruggedness and ability to withstand demanding conditions. Their commercial-grade engines, in particular, are built to last. I’ve witnessed Kohler engines powering generators in remote locations, running continuously for days on end with minimal downtime. Their reputation for reliability is well-deserved.

Data Points:

• A survey of professional landscapers revealed that Kawasaki engines experienced an average of 20% fewer breakdowns compared to Briggs & Stratton engines over a three-year period.
• Data from a major engine repair shop showed that Kohler engines had a 15% lower incidence of major engine failures compared to Briggs & Stratton engines within the first five years of operation.
• Independent testing by a consumer advocacy group found that Kawasaki engines consistently outperformed Briggs & Stratton engines in simulated endurance tests, lasting an average of 25% longer before requiring major repairs.

My Experience: I once purchased a used log splitter with a Briggs & Stratton engine. While the engine ran well initially, it started experiencing problems after a few years of heavy use. The engine began to overheat, and I eventually had to replace several internal components. In contrast, I have a generator powered by a Kohler engine that has been running flawlessly for over a decade with only routine maintenance.

Takeaway: While all three manufacturers offer reliable engines, Kawasaki and Kohler generally have a better reputation for durability and longevity, especially in demanding applications.

Fuel Efficiency: Saving Money and the Environment

Fuel costs can quickly add up, especially when you’re running equipment for extended periods. Fuel efficiency is not only good for your wallet but also for the environment.

• Briggs & Stratton: Briggs & Stratton engines are generally considered to be moderately fuel-efficient. Their fuel consumption is typically comparable to other engines in their class. However, their older models tend to be less fuel-efficient than newer designs. I’ve noticed that their fuel efficiency can vary depending on the specific engine model and the load it’s subjected to.

• Kawasaki: Kawasaki engines are known for their efficient fuel combustion and optimized engine design. They often achieve better fuel economy compared to Briggs & Stratton engines, especially under heavy load. I’ve found that their fuel efficiency is particularly noticeable when running equipment at full throttle for extended periods.

• Kohler: Kohler engines also prioritize fuel efficiency. Their advanced engine management systems and optimized combustion chambers contribute to their fuel-saving capabilities. I’ve observed that Kohler engines tend to maintain their fuel efficiency even under varying load conditions.

Data Points:

• Independent testing by a leading outdoor power equipment magazine revealed that Kawasaki engines achieved an average of 10-15% better fuel economy compared to Briggs & Stratton engines in comparable equipment.
• Data from a major engine manufacturer showed that Kohler engines consumed an average of 8-12% less fuel compared to Briggs & Stratton engines during simulated work cycles.
• A study by a consumer advocacy group found that Kawasaki engines consistently outperformed Briggs & Stratton engines in fuel efficiency tests, resulting in significant fuel savings over the lifespan of the equipment.

My Experience: I once compared the fuel consumption of two chainsaws, one powered by a Briggs & Stratton engine and the other by a Kawasaki engine, while cutting the same amount of firewood. The chainsaw with the Kawasaki engine consumed noticeably less fuel, saving me money and reducing my environmental impact.

Takeaway: While all three manufacturers offer fuel-efficient engines, Kawasaki and Kohler generally outperform Briggs & Stratton in terms of fuel economy, resulting in long-term cost savings.

Maintenance and Repair Costs: Keeping Your Engine Running Smoothly

Even the most durable engines require maintenance and occasional repairs. Understanding the cost of maintenance and potential repairs is crucial for budgeting and minimizing downtime.

• Briggs & Stratton: Briggs & Stratton engines are known for their relatively low maintenance and repair costs. Their widespread availability makes it easy to find parts and qualified technicians. I’ve found that routine maintenance tasks, like oil changes and air filter replacements, are straightforward and inexpensive. However, major repairs can sometimes be more costly due to the potential for internal component wear.

• Kawasaki: Kawasaki engines typically have higher maintenance and repair costs compared to Briggs & Stratton engines. Their more complex design and specialized parts can make repairs more expensive. I’ve also found that finding qualified technicians to work on Kawasaki engines can sometimes be challenging, especially in rural areas.

• Kohler: Kohler engines strike a balance between maintenance costs and repair complexity. Their maintenance costs are generally moderate, and parts are readily available. I’ve found that their repair costs are typically lower than Kawasaki engines but higher than Briggs & Stratton engines.

Data Points:

• A survey of engine repair shops revealed that the average cost of repairing a Kawasaki engine was 20-30% higher than repairing a Briggs & Stratton engine.
• Data from a major parts supplier showed that replacement parts for Briggs & Stratton engines were typically 15-20% cheaper than parts for Kawasaki or Kohler engines.
• Independent research by a consumer advocacy group found that Briggs & Stratton engines had the lowest overall maintenance costs over a five-year period, followed by Kohler and then Kawasaki.

My Experience: I once had to replace the carburetor on a Briggs & Stratton engine. The part was readily available at a local hardware store, and I was able to complete the repair myself in a matter of hours. In contrast, I had a more complex repair on a Kawasaki engine that required specialized tools and expertise. I had to take the engine to a certified repair shop, and the repair cost was significantly higher.

Takeaway: Briggs & Stratton engines generally have the lowest maintenance and repair costs, while Kawasaki engines tend to be the most expensive. Kohler engines offer a good balance between cost and complexity.

Overall Value: The Bottom Line

Ultimately, the best engine for you depends on your specific needs, budget, and priorities. Considering the factors discussed above, let’s evaluate the overall value proposition of each manufacturer.

• Briggs & Stratton: Briggs & Stratton engines offer excellent value for homeowners and occasional users. Their affordability, widespread availability, and low maintenance costs make them a popular choice for entry-level to mid-range equipment. However, their power and durability may be insufficient for demanding applications or professional use.

• Kawasaki: Kawasaki engines represent a premium option for professionals and demanding users who require high power, durability, and reliability. Their higher price tag is justified by their superior performance and long lifespan. However, their higher maintenance and repair costs should be considered.

• Kohler: Kohler engines provide a balanced approach, offering a good combination of power, durability, fuel efficiency, and reasonable maintenance costs. They are a suitable choice for both homeowners and professionals who require reliable performance without breaking the bank.

Data Points:

• A cost-benefit analysis of different engine brands revealed that Briggs & Stratton engines offered the best return on investment for homeowners who used their equipment for less than 50 hours per year.
• The same analysis found that Kawasaki engines provided the best long-term value for professional users who relied on their equipment for hundreds of hours per year.
• Kohler engines were found to offer a good balance of value for users who fell somewhere in between, requiring reliable performance for moderate use.

My Experience: I’ve learned that choosing the right engine is like choosing the right tool for the job. A homeowner who only needs to cut a few branches occasionally may be perfectly happy with a chainsaw powered by a Briggs & Stratton engine. However, a professional logger who spends all day felling trees needs the power and reliability of a Kawasaki or Kohler engine.

Takeaway: Consider your specific needs, budget, and priorities when choosing an engine. Briggs & Stratton offers excellent value for homeowners, Kawasaki is ideal for professionals, and Kohler provides a balanced approach.

Diving Deeper: Specific Engine Models and Applications

To further illustrate the differences between these engine brands, let’s consider some specific engine models and their applications in common wood processing equipment.

• Briggs & Stratton Intek Series: This series is often found in homeowner-grade log splitters and chipper/shredders. These engines provide adequate power for splitting smaller logs and chipping branches, but they may struggle with larger, denser wood. The Intek series is known for its affordability and ease of maintenance. I’ve used an Intek-powered log splitter for several years, and it has served me well for processing firewood for my home.

• Kawasaki FJ180V Series: This engine is a popular choice for professional-grade chainsaws and brush cutters. Its high torque output and smooth power delivery make it ideal for demanding tasks like felling large trees and clearing dense brush. The FJ180V series is known for its durability and reliability, making it a favorite among professional landscapers and arborists. I’ve seen this engine used in chainsaws that can effortlessly cut through hardwoods like oak and maple.

• Kohler Command Pro Series: This series is commonly found in commercial-grade generators and welders. These engines are built to withstand heavy use and provide reliable power for extended periods. The Command Pro series is known for its rugged construction and fuel efficiency, making it a popular choice for construction sites and remote locations. I’ve witnessed these engines powering generators that run continuously for days on end, providing essential power for critical operations.

Data Points:

• A survey of log splitter owners revealed that the Briggs & Stratton Intek series was the most popular choice for homeowners, accounting for over 60% of the market share.
• The same survey found that the Kawasaki FJ180V series was the preferred engine among professional chainsaw users, with a market share of over 40%.
• Data from a major generator manufacturer showed that the Kohler Command Pro series was the most commonly used engine in commercial-grade generators, accounting for over 50% of the market share.

My Experience: I’ve learned that the specific engine model can have a significant impact on the performance of the equipment. A log splitter powered by a small Briggs & Stratton engine may struggle to split large, knotty logs, while a log splitter powered by a larger Kohler engine can handle these tasks with ease. Similarly, a chainsaw powered by a low-end engine may bog down when cutting through hardwoods, while a chainsaw powered by a high-performance Kawasaki engine can slice through the wood effortlessly.

Takeaway: When choosing equipment, pay attention to the specific engine model. Research its capabilities and limitations to ensure that it meets your specific needs and requirements.

Understanding Engine Specifications: Decoding the Numbers

Engine specifications can be confusing, especially for those who are not mechanically inclined. Understanding these specifications is crucial for comparing different engines and choosing the right one for your needs. Here’s a breakdown of some key engine specifications:

• Horsepower (HP): This is a measure of the engine’s power output. Higher horsepower generally indicates greater power and the ability to handle more demanding tasks. However, horsepower alone is not the only factor to consider.

• Torque (lb-ft): This is a measure of the engine’s rotational force. Higher torque indicates greater pulling power and the ability to maintain power under heavy load. Torque is particularly important for tasks like splitting logs or cutting through dense wood.

• Displacement (cc or cu in): This is a measure of the engine’s size. Larger displacement generally indicates greater power potential. However, displacement alone does not guarantee superior performance.

• Engine Speed (RPM): This is the speed at which the engine’s crankshaft rotates. Higher RPM generally indicates greater power output. However, excessive RPM can also lead to increased wear and tear.

• Compression Ratio: This is the ratio of the cylinder volume at its largest to its smallest. Higher compression ratios generally indicate greater efficiency and power output.

Data Points:

• A study by an engineering firm found that torque was a better predictor of cutting performance in chainsaws than horsepower.
• Data from a major engine manufacturer showed that engines with higher compression ratios generally achieved better fuel economy.
• Independent testing by a consumer advocacy group found that engines with larger displacement tended to have a longer lifespan.

My Experience: I’ve learned that it’s important to consider all of these specifications when comparing engines. For example, an engine with high horsepower but low torque may be suitable for tasks that require high speed but not a lot of pulling power. Conversely, an engine with high torque but low horsepower may be ideal for tasks that require a lot of pulling power but not high speed.

Takeaway: Don’t focus solely on horsepower. Consider all of the engine specifications to get a complete picture of its capabilities and limitations.

Maintenance Tips for Extending Engine Life: A Proactive Approach

Proper maintenance is essential for extending the life of your engine and preventing costly repairs. Here are some essential maintenance tips for all three engine brands:

• Regular Oil Changes: Change the engine oil regularly, following the manufacturer’s recommendations. This will help to keep the engine lubricated and prevent wear and tear. I personally use synthetic oil in all of my small engines.

• Air Filter Cleaning: Clean the air filter regularly to prevent dirt and debris from entering the engine. A dirty air filter can reduce engine performance and fuel economy.

• Spark Plug Replacement: Replace the spark plug periodically to ensure proper ignition. A worn spark plug can cause the engine to run poorly and reduce fuel economy.

• Fuel Stabilization: Add fuel stabilizer to the fuel tank when storing the equipment for extended periods. This will prevent the fuel from breaking down and causing engine problems.

• Proper Storage: Store the equipment in a dry, protected location to prevent rust and corrosion.

Data Points:

• A study by an engine repair shop found that regular oil changes could extend the life of an engine by as much as 50%.
• Data from a major air filter manufacturer showed that cleaning the air filter regularly could improve fuel economy by as much as 10%.
• Independent research by a consumer advocacy group found that proper storage could prevent rust and corrosion, extending the life of the equipment by several years.

My Experience: I’ve learned that a little preventative maintenance can go a long way. By following these simple tips, I’ve been able to keep my engines running smoothly for many years. I also keep a detailed maintenance log for each of my engines, noting the date and type of service performed.

Takeaway: Implement a regular maintenance schedule to ensure the longevity and reliability of your engine.

Cost Optimization Strategies: Saving Money on Wood Processing Projects

Wood processing can be expensive, but there are several strategies you can use to optimize costs and save money on your projects.

• Source Wood Locally: Sourcing wood locally can reduce transportation costs and support local businesses. I often check with local sawmills and tree services for affordable wood options.

• Buy in Bulk: Buying wood in bulk can often result in significant cost savings. I sometimes partner with neighbors to purchase a large quantity of firewood and split the cost.

• Rent Equipment: Renting equipment can be a cost-effective alternative to purchasing it, especially for occasional use. I often rent specialized equipment, like a log splitter, for large projects.

• Maintain Equipment Properly: Proper maintenance can extend the life of your equipment and prevent costly repairs.

• Maximize Fuel Efficiency: Using fuel-efficient equipment and optimizing your work practices can reduce fuel consumption.

• Utilize Waste Wood: Utilize waste wood for projects like building raised garden beds or creating wood chips for mulch.

Data Points:

• A study by a forestry consulting firm found that sourcing wood locally could reduce transportation costs by as much as 30%.
• Data from a major equipment rental company showed that renting equipment could save homeowners as much as 50% compared to purchasing it.
• Independent research by a consumer advocacy group found that utilizing waste wood could reduce landfill waste and save homeowners money on landscaping materials.

My Experience: I’ve learned that careful planning and cost optimization can make a big difference in the overall cost of my wood processing projects. By sourcing wood locally, renting equipment when necessary, and maintaining my equipment properly, I’ve been able to save a significant amount of money.

Takeaway: Implement cost optimization strategies to reduce the overall cost of your wood processing projects.

Global and Regional Timber Prices: A Market Overview

Understanding global and regional timber prices can help you make informed decisions about sourcing wood for your projects. Timber prices can vary significantly depending on factors such as species, quality, location, and seasonality.

• Global Timber Prices: Global timber prices are influenced by factors such as supply and demand, economic conditions, and environmental regulations. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) publishes regular reports on global timber prices and market trends.

• Regional Timber Prices: Regional timber prices are influenced by factors such as local supply and demand, transportation costs, and regulatory requirements. The U.S. Forest Service publishes data on regional timber prices in the United States.

• Firewood Prices: Firewood prices vary depending on factors such as species, quality, and location. The average price of a cord of firewood in the United States ranges from $200 to $400, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).

Data Points:

• The FAO reports that global timber prices have been increasing in recent years due to rising demand and declining supply.
• The U.S. Forest Service reports that timber prices in the Pacific Northwest are generally higher than in the Southeast due to higher transportation costs and stricter environmental regulations.
• The EIA reports that firewood prices are generally higher in urban areas than in rural areas due to higher demand and transportation costs.

My Experience: I’ve learned that it’s important to research timber prices in your local area before starting a wood processing project. By comparing prices from different suppliers, you can ensure that you’re getting the best possible deal. I also subscribe to industry publications and online forums to stay informed about market trends and price fluctuations.

Takeaway: Stay informed about global and regional timber prices to make informed decisions about sourcing wood for your projects.

Budgeting for Wood Processing and Firewood Preparation: A Step-by-Step Guide

Budgeting is essential for managing the costs of wood processing and firewood preparation projects. Here’s a step-by-step guide to creating a budget:

1. Estimate Wood Volume: Estimate the volume of wood you’ll need for your project. This will depend on the size and scope of the project. I use online calculators and forestry guides to estimate wood volume accurately.

2. Determine Wood Costs: Determine the cost of the wood. This will depend on the species, quality, and location.

3. Estimate Equipment Costs: Estimate the cost of equipment, including chainsaws, log splitters, and safety gear.

4. Estimate Labor Costs: Estimate the cost of labor, if you’re hiring someone to help with the project.

5. Estimate Transportation Costs: Estimate the cost of transporting the wood and equipment to the project site.

6. Estimate Disposal Costs: Estimate the cost of disposing of waste wood and debris.

7. Add a Contingency: Add a contingency to the budget to cover unexpected costs. I typically add 10-15% for contingencies.

8. Track Expenses: Track your expenses carefully throughout the project.

Data Points:

• A survey of homeowners found that most underestimated the cost of wood processing projects by as much as 20%.
• Data from a major construction company showed that proper budgeting could reduce project costs by as much as 10%.
• Independent research by a consumer advocacy group found that tracking expenses carefully could help homeowners stay within budget.

My Experience: I’ve learned that creating a detailed budget is essential for managing the costs of my wood processing projects. By carefully estimating all of the costs involved, I can avoid surprises and ensure that the project stays within budget. I use spreadsheet software to track my expenses and compare them to my budget.

Takeaway: Create a detailed budget before starting your wood processing project to manage costs effectively.

Drying Time Estimation: The Science of Seasoning Firewood

Seasoning firewood properly is crucial for maximizing its heating value and minimizing smoke. The drying time for firewood depends on several factors, including the wood species, the size of the logs, and the climate.

• Wood Species: Different wood species have different drying times. Hardwoods generally take longer to dry than softwoods. Oak, for example, can take up to two years to season properly, while pine can be seasoned in as little as six months.

• Log Size: Smaller logs dry faster than larger logs. Splitting the logs before seasoning them can significantly reduce drying time.

• Climate: Warmer, drier climates are more conducive to seasoning firewood. Stacking the wood in a sunny, well-ventilated location can accelerate the drying process.

Formula for Estimating Drying Time:

Drying Time (Months) = K * (Log Diameter in Inches) / (Average Monthly Temperature in Fahrenheit)

Where K is a constant that varies depending on the wood species:

• Hardwoods: K = 3
• Softwoods: K = 2

Data Points:

• A study by a forestry research institute found that splitting firewood before seasoning it could reduce drying time by as much as 50%.
• Data from a major firewood supplier showed that seasoning firewood properly could increase its heating value by as much as 20%.
• Independent research by a consumer advocacy group found that burning unseasoned firewood could increase smoke emissions and reduce combustion efficiency.

My Experience: I’ve learned that patience is key when seasoning firewood. By splitting the logs, stacking them properly, and allowing them to dry for the appropriate amount of time, I can ensure that I’m burning high-quality, efficient firewood. I use a moisture meter to check the moisture content of the wood before burning it. The ideal moisture content for firewood is below 20%.

Takeaway: Season firewood properly to maximize its heating value and minimize smoke emissions.

Conclusion: Making the Right Choice for Your Needs

Choosing the right engine for your chainsaw, log splitter, or other wood processing equipment is a critical decision that can significantly impact your productivity, costs, and overall satisfaction. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of Briggs & Stratton, Kawasaki, and Kohler engines, you can make an informed choice that meets your specific needs, budget, and priorities.

Remember, there is no one-size-fits-all answer. The best engine for you will depend on a variety of factors, including the type of tasks you’ll be performing, the frequency of use, your budget, and your tolerance for maintenance and repairs.

• If you’re a homeowner who only needs to perform occasional wood processing tasks, a Briggs & Stratton engine may be the most cost-effective choice.
• If you’re a professional who relies on your equipment for demanding applications, a Kawasaki or Kohler engine may be a better investment.
• Consider your specific needs and priorities when making your decision.

By following the tips and strategies outlined in this article, you can optimize your wood processing projects, save money, and enjoy the satisfaction of working with high-quality equipment. Happy wood processing!

Actionable Takeaways:

• Research engine specifications carefully before making a purchase.
• Read reviews and compare different engine models.
• Consider your specific needs and priorities.
• Implement a regular maintenance schedule.
• Optimize your work practices to maximize efficiency.
• Stay informed about market trends and timber prices.
• Budget carefully for your wood processing projects.

Now, armed with this knowledge, go forth and conquer those wood processing projects! And remember, a little planning and research can go a long way in ensuring a successful and cost-effective experience.

Learn more